Debate about Šumava National Park in the Czech Chamber of Deputies

Varování

Publikace nespadá pod Filozofickou fakultu, ale pod Fakultu sociálních studií. Oficiální stránka publikace je na webu muni.cz.
Autoři

SKALÍK Jan

Rok publikování 2015
Druh Článek v odborném periodiku
Časopis / Zdroj Envigogika
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Fakulta sociálních studií

Citace
www http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/429/598
Obor Politologie a politické vědy
Klíčová slova Šumava; national park; nature protection; Parliament; discourse
Přiložené soubory
Popis This mixed research design study combines three different methods of corpus pattern analysis in order to comprehend the way in which the non-intervention principle towards ecosystems in core areas of Šumava National Park is utilized in legislation and parliamentary plenary debates. We summarize legislative proposals related to the Park, report on their legislative process and describe the evolution of wording and language nuances in different bills. This study also focuses on the content of the corpus of debates about Šumava National Park in the Chamber of Deputies between 1990 and 2013 and concludes that politicians use the situation in Šumava to support their political strategies, referring to the non-intervention principle only immanently. Analysis of these two datasets presents basic patterns related to the non-intervention principle. The study concludes that the scientific approach, reducing political influence on the territory gradually disappears from the content of parliamentary debates as well as from the mission statement of particular bills related to the Park.
Související projekty:

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.