How did constitutional court deal with judging payback period of investment to solar power plants

Varování

Publikace nespadá pod Filozofickou fakultu, ale pod Právnickou fakultu. Oficiální stránka publikace je na webu muni.cz.
Autoři

VALACHOVÁ Martina

Rok publikování 2015
Druh Článek ve sborníku
Konference System of financial law: general part
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Právnická fakulta

Citace
www http://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/system-of-financial-law/general-part.pdf
Obor Právní vědy
Klíčová slova Solar Tax; Discounted Payback Period; Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Přiložené soubory
Popis This contribution deals with approach of Constitutional Court to assessing payback period of investment to solar power plant projects in Czech Republic. The main aim of the article is to confirm the hypothesis that Constitutional Court of Czech Republic failed when judging payback period of investment, because it based his verdict on incorrect evidence provided by Energy Regulatory Office. This contribution will explain the circumstances of implementing solar tax and emphasize individual mistakes in Constitutional Court's and Energy Regulatory Office's actions. To confirm the hypothesis stated above methods of comparison, synthesis and analysis and literature review were used.
Související projekty:

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.