Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews

Logo poskytovatele

Varování

Publikace nespadá pod Filozofickou fakultu, ale pod Lékařskou fakultu. Oficiální stránka publikace je na webu muni.cz.
Autoři

MUNN Zachary STONE Jennifer C AROMATARIS Edoardo KLUGAR Miloslav SEARS Kim LEONARDI-BEE Jo BARKER Timothy Hugh

Rok publikování 2023
Druh Článek v odborném periodiku
Časopis / Zdroj JBI Evidence Synthesis
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Lékařská fakulta

Citace
www https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/fulltext/2023/03000/assessing_the_risk_of_bias_of_quantitative.2.aspx
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00224
Klíčová slova critical appraisal; methodological quality; risk of bias; systematic reviews
Popis A key step in the systematic review process is the assessment of the methodological quality (or risk of bias) of the included studies. At JBI, we have developed several tools to assist with this evaluation. As evidence synthesis methods continue to evolve, it has been necessary to revise and reflect on JBI's current approach to critical appraisal and to plan a strategy for the future. In this first paper of a series focusing on risk of bias assessment, we introduce our vision for risk of bias assessment for JBI. In future papers in this series, the methodological approach taken for this revision process will be discussed, along with the revised tools and guidance for using these tools.
Související projekty:

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.