Regionalni i lokalni toponimi u srpskoj, hrvatskoj, bugarskoj i češkoj frazeologiji
| Title in English | Regional and Local Toponyms in Serbian, Croatian, Bulgarian and Czech Phraseology |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Year of publication | 2018 |
| Type | Article in Periodical |
| Magazine / Source | Južnoslovenski filolog |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| Doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/JFI1802185K |
| Keywords | Czech phraseology; Serbian phraseology; Croatian phraseology; Bulgarian phraseology; phrasemes with a toponymic component |
| Attached files | |
| Description | The comparative method allows us to make remarkable conclusions. In the examples, it is obvious that there is often an universal model of phraseology used in several national societies and which shows differences exclusively in the toponymic component (Serb./Croat. mirna X[TOP], Serb./Croat./Bulg. proći kao X[ANTHROP] na Y[TOP]…), on the other hand, we can reveal a model that is associated only with a certain national community, with its language, and for which there is no analogy in another, although neighboring language (Bulg. X[ANTHROP] ot Y[TOP] in the sense of "I do not know who"). The toponymic component (or what it represents) can be in a direct motivational connection with the meaning of the phrasem (Kosovo, Chlumec), where without some cultural-historical education or knowledge, some phrasemes can not be correctly interpreted (decoded). There are, however, cases where the toponymic component may have no connection with the meaning of the phrasem in which it is a part – an example of this is the Czech collocation vrabci z Čech or the Bulgarian kum Dušan ot Niš. |
| Related projects: |