Miller's and Taliga's Fallacies about Verisimilitude Counting

Investor logo
Authors

RACLAVSKÝ Jiří

Year of publication 2008
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Organon F
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Arts

Citation
Field Philosophy and religion
Keywords verisimilitude; translation invariance; conceptual systems; constructions; transparent intensional logic
Description The present paper is a reaction to David Miller's and Milos Taliga's defence of so called linguistic dependence of verisimilitude counting of Pavel Tichý's approach. I show mainly that their construal of identity of scientific theories is fallacious thus it cannot support an argument against Tichý's conception.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.