Odpověď Ondřeji Kočnarovi
| Title in English | A Reply to Ondřej Kočnar |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Year of publication | 2008 |
| Type | Article in Periodical |
| Magazine / Source | Profil - Elektronický časopis pro filozofii |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| Web | http://profil.muni.cz/02_2008/belohrad_odpoved.html |
| Field | Philosophy and religion |
| Keywords | religious experience; jutification; principle of credulity; foundationalisim; epistemic duty; burden of proof |
| Description | In this work I reply to the critique of my work Atheism, theism and the justification of private evidence by Ondřej Kočnar. I argue that the acceptance of the principle of credulity does not justify private religious experience; private religious expericence is immune to falsification, thus wrong; private religious experience requires a great deal of interpretation; the burden of proof is not carried by the atheist. |