Volumetric analysis versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors and modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors in the evaluation of HCC after transarterial chemoembolization

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Arts. It includes Faculty of Medicine. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.

Authors	STAŇKOVÁ Monika ANDRAŠINA Tomáš SEDMÍK Jaroslav VÁLEK Vlastimil OSTŘÍŽKOVÁ Lenka TUČEK Štěpán
Year of publication	2016
Type	Conference abstract
MU Faculty or unit	Faculty of Medicine
Citation
Description	Purpose of this study is to compare volumetric analysis with the standard criteria - response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) and modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) - for the evaluation of HCC and its response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The total of 40 patients was included in the study. Volumetric analysis was statistically proven the strongest factor of the correlation with the length of the survival of the patients, contrary to RECIST and mRECIST. It is a convenient way to evaluate the response of HCC to treatment, particularly in complex tumors after TACE.
Related projects:	Radiologické diagnostické a intervenční postupy u onkologických pacientů a jejich přínos v rámci komplexní onkologické léčby s důrazem na farmakoekonomické aspekty.